|
Landmark case regarding unlawful search and seizures, and protection against self-incrimination.
Boyd was charged with attempting to willfully fraud the United States while importing 35 cases of
plate glass; allegedly failing to pay proper import duties. The property was seized by the tax collector
and forfeited to the U.S.
Boyd was ordered by the district court to produce the applicable invoice, but Boyd objected that to
do so would result in the invoice being used to incriminate Boyd. Boyd asserted that no person can be
compelled to provide evidence that could so incriminate.
The Supreme Court agreed. In the majority opinion, Justice Bradley stated, “It is the duty of
courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy
encroachments thereon.”
Full Text: Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S.
616 (1886) |